Take The Professional Ethics Challenge for October!
Ethics Case No. 1 – Bribes, Considerations and Fees
Anonymous Author
Statement of the Situation
An oil company with concessions in an African country has exploration drill equipment, camp facilities and supplies sitting in the government customs yard. The senior customs official is indirectly suggesting that a “consideration” in cash be made to ensure the equipment is released in a timely manner. There are no customs documents, which suggest that such a fee is officially sanctioned by the government. Equipment has been sitting in the port facility for 6 weeks and the project is falling behind schedule. The approaching rainy season will make roads impassable and precious time is being lost in the drill season. The costs of delaying the project far exceed the cost of the “consideration” as driller crews and field personnel have arrived and are all in hotels awaiting mobilization. These types of “considerations” are encountered throughout the country at all levels of government, at police road checks, for drilling permits, for water permits, for the use of surface rights, at local health clinics, etc. The people in this country are desperately poor and it is a ‘cultural norm’ for them to share their earnings with their entire tribe.
Question
Which of the following ethical routes should the professional geoscientist follow?
A. Refuse to pay as per company ethical guidelines and notify various government ministers to apply pressure. Action sends a message to officials that bribes will not be tolerated now or in future.
B. Pay the fee and stop wasting shareholders money. Assume the fee is just part of doing business and is the cultural/ethical norm in that country.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened? Actual outcome will appear in Field Notes-November, 2005 issue.
Wanted: Ethical cases regarding incomplete disclosure, problems with conflicting test data results, insufficient information with which to draw stated conclusions, pressure to rewrite conclusions or any others that you can think of that affect geoscientists. Authors will remain anonymous. Articles to be published in future issues of Field Notes.
|